Published January 4, 2006
by Foundation Press .
Written in English
|The Physical Object|
|Number of Pages||330|
Highlights of this offering from Murray and DeSanctis' Legal Research and Writing include: Use of the TREAT paradigm and the doctrine of explanatory synthesis which are superior rhetorical devices to maximize the persuasive potential of adversarial legal writing; Multiple annotated samples of each form of work product (pre-trial motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment, a writ. Adversarial Legal Writing and Oral Argument (University Casebook Series) by Christy tis, Michael and a great selection of related books, art and collectibles available now at - Adversarial Legal Writing and Oral Argument University Casebook Series by Michael D Murray; Christy H Desanctis - AbeBooks. Highlights of this offering from Murray and DeSanctis' Legal Research and Writing include: Use of the TREAT paradigm and the doctrine of explanatory synthesis which are superior rhetorical devices to maximize the persuasive potential of adversarial legal writing; Multiple annotated samples of each form of work product (pre-trial motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment, a writ petition. Adversarial legal writing --Pretrial motions --Motions to dismiss --Motions for summary judgment --Appellate advocacy --Appellate briefs --Oral advocacy at pretrial, trial & appellate stages --Strategies for Moot Court & beyond.
Effective Lawyering takes a unique approach to legal writing and oral advocacy. Many excellent legal writing books exhaustively detail how to write effectively. Those books — which are written primarily for first-year law students and are often several hundred pages long — meticulously explain the dos and don’ts of effective advocacy and provide numerous exercises for students to complete.3/5(1). Nigel J. Jamieson, The Ubiquitous Book Review, 17 Law & Critique – (). (). Michael D. Murray,Adversarial Legal Writing and Oral Argument, [New York, NY: Foundation Press, p.] Tammy R. Pettinato, An Annotated Bibliography of Law Review Articles Addressing Feminist. The first half focuses on general rules of argument and brief writing, while the second is centered around oral argument. I found a ton of practical tips in here and it looks like a dipped this book in highlighter because of all the salient points I wanted to outline later—which you can obtain here (21 pages). Here are six tips on legal. Oral Argument Outline 1. Remember: a. Oral arguments start when the panel enters the room (or you enter the room). You are “on” from the moment the panel has the opportunity to see you. Similarly, you are not finished with your presentation until the panel can no longer see you. b. Your presentation is a CONVERSTATION with the court. Size: 81KB.
Introduction to Advocacy and Legal writing. It concludes with a lecture on structuring an oral argument and its delivery. In an adversarial system, if both parties are presenting their arguments in the best possible way using the strongest arguments that are available. The court is then in the best position to adjudicate the issue. The author contends the law can be understood in terms of five types of legal argument, which fall under the following categories: text, intent, precedent, tradition, and policy. The author also contends each type of legal argument arises from a different source of law. The book is written /5(6). Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for Adversarial Legal Writing and Oral Argument (University Casebook Series) at Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our 5/5. First Year Law Student Guide: Legal Writing & Citation This guide provides resources to help new UCLA law students get started with Law School and become more familiar with the Law Library, UCLA and : Donna Gulnac.